F I N A L Grades for Review:

These include a 10% COVID Handicap.  An ordinary semester in class would have had more opportunity for critique and perfection of documents, but y'all did pretty good, warms my heart to see it while it fries my cones looking for points...

Points Now: 117 Total Points: 117 2 5 10
5
5
10
10 15
20
10 10 15
Exit Exam Raw Score
Secret Word Grade + 10 Points Percent of Points Points Earned Log In Set Passwd Startup Ledger Shop Mast Head QOH, GLTB, Shop Ready Critique Proj 1 Dlv 1 Rebranded with Items
SQL Announced Pop Quiz Critique SQL Quiz Critique Exit Exam Proj 1 Div 2 Form Critique Project 2 AA Menu Update and Report Critique Project #3 Earn C'mssn from Buy Me Teams Net Fees for 2017 Winter GLTB Project #4 Doc 2017 Winter Critique
Alligator A 87% 102 2 5 10
5
5
5
5 13 Selections don't come back set the same after submit 20 Site works, got it done, got spec violations cleared 10 10 12 Settlement process isn't about settlement, names no orders, references no account numbers. Diagrams are dead on and very good-looking. Database ERD needs ellipses or some way to show the column list is way abbreviated... 68.33
Alpha C 56% 66 2 5 10
0 Nothing there, logged in to take sample quiz, nothing else 5
5 No valid queries 5 9 Form has been customized but doesn't submit and validate, Javascript pre-edit doesn't work, too many spec violations, left SeSDoC in place 10 Got a table in place, nothing's in it. Site doesn't work, no menu, no logout, [[[placeholders]]]] still showing
10 5 PAYGO description is not accurate, doesn't discuss netting out fees. The diagrams are complete fiction and don't describe 2017Winter at all. 55
ama B 73% 85 2 5 10




8 Close on 2, got 3 and 4 9 14 Left spec violations, form works fine 17 Most works, still debugging report, login advice is not at upper right. 5 10 5 PAYGO description is not accurate, doesn't discuss netting out fees. The diagrams are complete fiction and don't describe 2017Winter at all. 78.33
Apples A 87% 101.5 2 5 10 Has items, no GLTB, items don't meet specs 5 Very small logo will detract from a pro look. SiteThumb not changed out, no product images 2.5 Got one, not close on the other 5 Close on two 7 13 Javascript pre-edit doesn't work. 19 Login advice isn't right-justified, thanks for clearingup spec violations 10 10 13 The use case and class diagrams show some reflection on what the app does but don't use the terms from the database and app's menu so aren't clear. The database ERD would be improved by adding ellipses or otherwise showing that lots of columns are missing, and some general neatening up. The state charts are not accurate. The settlement process is accurate, way sketchy, but does mention 5009. 75
BubbleGumz A 85% 100 2 5 9 A customer shows up with three different accounts in the masthead 5
4 1st query included lots of orgs not in this semester 6 Passed on 1, still debugging the others 5 15
20 Does it all, thanks! 10 10 9 The use case diagram appears somewhat accurate, but it shorts the site manager's uses and doesn't resemble the menu choices in the app, and uses are scattered around at random. The class diagram is complete fiction, in no way resembles 2017Winter. The database ERD is close. Neither of the state charts is accurate. The description of settlement describes some of what R Chihuahua can do, but mentions nothing of the settlement process. 70
dyn A 82% 96 2 5 10
5
5
6 Got the last one, nowhere near close on two, one nearly works 8 15
15 Login advice isn't right-justified, link back to menu is missing on the referral form, can't get back to see report after filling in a form. 10 10 5 PAYGO description is not accurate, doesn't discuss netting out fees. The diagrams are complete fiction and don't describe 2017Winter at all. 78.33
Fabric A 90% 105 2 5 7 Has items but none in stock ready to sell, no GLTB 3 Sharp rebranding, but form is broken 4 Didn't fact check 1st, has prior semesters' partner orgs 9 2, 3, 4 are right on, no Woof Balls 9 15
19 Easy to score, fine gif, thorough rebranding of every utterance, login advice isn't at upper-right... 10 10 12 Use Case diagram shorts Site Manager most of his uses, could be rethought without crossed lines, crossed lines detract from a pro look on the class diagram. The database ERD is printed too small to be useful. Good enough drafts The Fulfillment process is detailed, but the Settlement process was asked for. 78.33
Foxtrot A 84% 98 2 5 7 Has items but none in stock ready to sell, no GLTB 5 Arrived, enthusiastic look is appreciated 5 Please use meaningful names for cast columns, single letters devalue the legacy 8 No Woof Balls, skipped 2, 3 works except for QOH, got 4 10 15
19 Login advice isn't justified, otherwise is very fine, site works. 10
12 Use Case diagram shorts Site Manager most of his uses, could be rethought without crossed lines, crossed lines detract from a pro look on the class diagram. The database ERD is printed too small to be useful. Good enough drafts The Fulfillment process is detailed, but the Settlement process was asked for. 85
Jackpot B 75% 88 2 5 7 Has items but none in stock ready to sell, no GLTB 5 Thanks for enthusiastic tweaking, looks sharp 5 I'd suggest using more descriptive names for cast tables. Names like ac1, ac2, ac3 don't add much value to a legacy, don't make it easier for anybody else to figure out 8 Passed on Woof Balls, the easy one, got the other 3 5 15
14 Form's broken, database is empty, still debugging, form only works first time through after login, site works otherwise, best gif
10 12 Use Case diagram shorts Site Manager most of his uses, could be rethought without crossed lines, crossed lines detract from a pro look on the class diagram. The database ERD is printed too small to be useful. Good enough drafts The Fulfillment process is detailed, but the Settlement process was asked for. 68.33
KeqinqMain A 89% 104 2 5 10
5
5
7 Got 4, debugging 2 and 3 5 13 Javascript pre-edit doesn't work, selects don't come back set as before submit 20 Site works fine , spec violations are cleared. 10 10 12 Settlement process isn't about settlement, names no orders, references no account numbers. Diagrams are dead on and very good-looking. Database ERD needs ellipses or some way to show the column list is way abbreviated... 55
Kuzan A 86% 101 2 5 9 A customer shows up with three different accounts in the masthead 5 Scintillating logo image looks good 5
6 4 may work but wasn't usuable as pasted, others don't 6 15
19 Login advice isn't right-justified as spec'd, site works fine , spec violations were cleared 10 10 9 The use case diagram appears somewhat accurate, but it shorts the site manager's uses and doesn't resemble the menu choices in the app, and uses are scattered around at random. The class diagram is complete fiction, in no way resembles 2017Winter. The database ERD is close. Neither of the state charts is accurate. The description of settlement describes some of what R Chihuahua can do, but mentions nothing of the settlement process. 73.33
MapCom A 87% 101.5 2 5 10
4 SeSDoC is trademarked 3.5 Please don't copy a multi-line query from MySQL. When you make it work hit the up-arrow so it's all wrapped in one line and copy that. The 1st query looks correct, the 2nd one wasn't 5 Good try on most, none worked 5 15
18 Form is missing link back to menu, Javascipt edit doesn't work. 10 10 14 Very detailed Use Cases appear to document what goes on, but would be much easier to understand if they used the terms in the app and database instead ofgeneral descriptions. The settlement process was not accurately described, is just the fulfillment crew's menu. State charts are accurate, database ERD and class diagram are a mess, same mess as another team. 71.67
Maroc B 70% 82 2 5 10
2 No product images, SeSDoCis trademarked 2 Had something for each query, niether got correct results 6 No Woof Balls, really twisted 2nd works, 3 and 4 don't 7

14 Form doesn't link back to menu, can't get back to see reports, login advice is missing.no option to logoff, left violations of specs. 10 10 14 Very detailed Use Cases appear to document what goes on, but would be much easier to understand if they used the terms in the app and database instead ofgeneral descriptions. The settlement process was not accurately described, is just the fulfillment crew's menu. State charts are accurate, database ERD and class diagram are a mess, same mess as another team. 76.67
Moka A 87% 102 2 5 10
5
5
6 No Woof Balls, others still debugging 5 12 Javascript pre-edit doesn't work, selections don't come back set the same after submit, otherwise works. 20 Site works fine, no spec violations 10 10 12 Settlement process isn't about settlement, names no orders, references no account numbers. Diagrams are dead on and very good-looking. Database ERD needs ellipses or some way to show the column list is way abbreviated... 58.33
Ocho C 63% 74 2 5 3 Has items, no GLTB, items don't meet specs 0 Still in list at the bottom of the page 0
5 Got the 4th one, was prior scored as zero 5 12 Form didn't get specs for full mailing address. 19 Login advice isn't right-justified 10
13 The use case and class diagrams show some reflection on what the app does but don't use the terms from the database and app's menu so aren't clear. The database ERD would be improved by adding ellipses or otherwise showing that lots of columns are missing, and some general neatening up. The state charts are not accurate. The settlement process is accurate, way sketchy, but does mention 5009. 33.33
Panda C 60% 70 2 5 9 All good except has contra-posted a/r 0 Nothing done 5
5 Close on Woof Balls and 2nd, others not close 5 15
13 Login advice doesn't mention name, form fails and spills JavaScript at update, there is no table in the database, report has been faked in code.

11 Diagrams are accurate, description of settlement process isnt 68.33
Pineapple808 A 85% 100 2 5 9 A customer shows up with three different accounts in the masthead 5
5
5 Got some result for all 4, none were accurate 6 15
19 Login advice isn't right-justified 10 10 9 The use case diagram appears somewhat accurate, but it shorts the site manager's uses and doesn't resemble the menu choices in the app, and uses are scattered around at random. The class diagram is complete fiction, in no way resembles 2017Winter. The database ERD is close. Neither of the state charts is accurate. The description of settlement describes some of what R Chihuahua can do, but mentions nothing of the settlement process. 73.33
Pinot A 82% 96 2 5 7 Has items but none in stock ready to sell, no GLTB 1 No transparect background in the thumnail, css not linked properly, appears to have broken form in place of a proper home page, index.html, with any graphics 4 Used 2019 in the query, wasn't this semester's partner orgs 5 Got 4th, only placeholders for the others 7 13 SiteThumb misses spec for transparent background 20
10 10 12 Use Case diagram shorts Site Manager most of his uses, could be rethought without crossed lines, crossed lines detract from a pro look on the class diagram. The database ERD is printed too small to be useful. Good enough drafts The Fulfillment process is detailed, but the Settlement process was asked for. 76.67
Silent_Cal A 90% 105 2 5 10
5
5 Thanks, is good to see 5 No Woof Balls, 4) is correct, others are reasonable 6 15
20
10 10 12 Settlement process isn't about settlement, names no orders, references no account numbers. Diagrams are dead on and very good-looking. Database ERD needs ellipses or some way to show the column list is way abbreviated... 73.33
Solo A 81% 95 2 5 9 A customer shows up with three different accounts in the masthead 3 Appears to avoid using vi , log shows only inappropriate use of sftp 2 Didn't follow instructions, has UniCode in the queries, neither works 7 No 1 or 3, got 2 and close on 4 5 14 Left spec violations otherwise form works fine 19 Login advice not right-justified as spec'd detract from an otherwise fine job, site works... 10 10 9 The use case diagram appears somewhat accurate, but it shorts the site manager's uses and doesn't resemble the menu choices in the app, and uses are scattered around at random. The class diagram is complete fiction, in no way resembles 2017Winter. The database ERD is close. Neither of the state charts is accurate. The description of settlement describes some of what R Chihuahua can do, but mentions nothing of the settlement process. 66.67
taco66 D 37% 43 2 5 10
0 Nothing there 0
0
0 11 Lots of spec violations, missing transparent background, selections don't come back set after submit 0 Nothing done past Dlv #2
10 5 PAYGO description is not accurate, doesn't discuss netting out fees. The diagrams are complete fiction and don't describe 2017Winter at all. 0
Tuco A 86% 101 2 5 10
4 SeSDoC is trademarked 5
7 No Woof Balls, 2 has UniCode in it and breaks, placeholder for 3, 4 works 5 15
14 Login advice isn't right-justified, database is empty, nothing to report, left lots of spec violations 10 10 14 Very detailed Use Cases appear to document what goes on, but would be much easier to understand if they used the terms in the app and database instead ofgeneral descriptions. The settlement process was not accurately described, is just the fulfillment crew's menu. State charts are accurate, database ERD and class diagram are a mess, same mess as another team. 70
WeWindows A 97% 114 2 5 10
5
5
7 No Woof Balls, got 2, 3 and 4 need debugging 10 15
20
10 10 15 Settlement process is accurate, sketchy, Think about showing inheritance among actors in the use case diagram. 81.67
WiFi A 94% 110.5 2 5 10
5 What, no advice to team about SeSDoC trademark? 3.5 2nd query looks close but gets no results 6 Got the 4th, others need debugging joins 10 15
20 You make it easy, early start, read the specs 10 10 14 Very detailed Use Cases appear to document what goes on, but would be much easier to understand if they used the terms in the app and database instead ofgeneral descriptions. The settlement process was not accurately described, is just the fulfillment crew's menu. State charts are accurate, database ERD and class diagram are a mess, same mess as another team. 81.67