POLI 355
Asian Governments and
Politics
Research paper Instructions
This is big and has very important information in it. For that reason, I’ve created a Table of Contents (linked to sections below) for you to use to find information you’re looking for. You should read this entire assignment, however. I guarantee you will wind up with a better grade if you do.
What is
comparative politics and how do I write a “comparative” paper?
Numbering
Endnotes or Footnotes
Nitpicks and Style Issue (or Helpful
hints)
You've got a lot of leeway here. What I want is for you to do some real comparative politics. Pick two nations and compare some political, social, or economic change within them. For the given subject you picked, what are the similarities and differences between the two nations and the causes of those similarities and differences.
How do I define Asia geographically: anything from Afghanistan and Pakistan in the West to Japan in the East to Australia and New Zealand in the South to Mongolia in the North. If you have questions about this, let me know. What kind of issues am I looking for? Anything you find interesting is fine with me as long as I approve it. Try to limit this to more recent events or trends, preferably since 1980. Try to pick as narrow a topic as you can. I can help you with this. For example, a comparison of economic policies in Japan and South Korea is too broad a topic. That’s a book, not a paper. A comparison of anti-trust policies in Japan and South Korea is more like it. A comparison of the decline of Congress Party in India to the decline of the KMT in Taiwan might be too big as well. This you could tweak to compare the fate of these parties in the most recent election. It gets you at the subject you’re interested in, but in a more manageable way. All kinds of issues are potential topics. Here are some examples: comparison of Islamic political parties in Indonesia and Malaysia; comparison of women’s participation in government in any two nations; comparison of any two nations trade with another major nation (Japan, China, the US); comparison of the security of military relationships between any two nations and the big players in the region (US, China, Russia, India, Japan); a comparative study of the role of the military in politics in any two nations (this is not relevant for all nations); the relationship between ASEAN and some of the larger players in the region; civil liberties policies in any two nations; tariff policies of any two nations; some specific aspect of health care systems in any two nations; minority rights in any two nations; regionalism as a factor in politics in any two nations electoral outcomes; political participation in any two nations; voting turnout in any two nations. Get the topic to me and then we can tinker with it to make it as interesting and as doable as possible.
Here’s an example. Let’s say you handed me this as a paper topic: Religion in Politics in India and Indonesia. This is a huge topic. I would tell you to narrow this down. So you could narrow it down in the following ways:
·
religious-based
political parties
·
major
political parties attitude toward religion
·
political
mobilization by major religious organizations
·
voting
patterns by various religious groups
·
the
impact of religious issues during the most recent elections
On the date indicated on the syllabus you should turn in a one-paragraph outline of your chosen topic. It should include the following:
The purpose of this is to let me know what you are working on. This way I can help steer you in the right direction, warn you about troubles you may encounter, and generally deal with any questions you might have.
For lots of detail on Comparative Politics, read the short essay on the Comparative Method that is linked to the syllabus and linked here (Newmann, "The Comparative Method." It is an assigned reading for the first week.
The basic issue for research in comparative politics is to pay attention to your methodology. It’s actually very simple, but generally ignored. How do you compare things? A simple example let’s say you’re comparing oranges and basketballs. You’ve chosen to compare them using shape and color. They’re both round and orange. They are exactly the same. Research done. “In conclusion, oranges and basketballs are absolutely identical, except in the case of the American Basketball Association, which used red, white, and blue balls. The ABA, however, folded after the 1976 season. Since then, scholars have been unable to develop meaningful methods to distinguish between basketballs and oranges.” Okay, maybe we need to think a bit more deeply about the categories we use to compare them. That’s the key. In doing comparative research, you’re searching for ways to highlight similarities and differences, so you need to find categories for comparison that highlight the important similarities and differences. These are essentially questions you are asking. For oranges and basketballs, better categories of comparison (or better questions to ask) might be their size and, most importantly, their purpose. So you’re asking two questions: What are similarities or differences in the size of oranges and basketballs? You’re asking: what are the similarities and differences in the purposes of oranges and basketballs? Oranges are small; basketballs are larger. More importantly, oranges are fruits for eating and basketballs are for playing a sport. Their purpose is the difference. This is a silly example, but it makes the point: finding good categories for comparison matters.
Let’s say your topic was Malaysian and Indonesia trade relations with Singapore. You need to find good categories of comparison so this doesn’t become just a bunch of statistics. As you do your research you’ll gain knowledge about the trade relationships and you’ll find the important elements of their trade. In this case, a good set of categories for comparison would be: multilateral and bilateral trade relations. Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore are all parts of ASEAN. ASEAN is deeply involved in developing greater trade among its members and reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers. One category for comparison would be multilateral trade relations. The question is how do Malaysia and Indonesia operate within ASEAN and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum? In ASEAN and APEC debates is Malaysia allied with or arguing with Singapore? In ASEAN and APEC debates is Indonesia allied with or arguing with Singapore? The second category would be bilateral trade relations. This is a comparison of Malaysian trade relations with Singapore and Indonesian trade relations with Singapore. But this might be a bit big and fuzzy, so you may want to define that category a bit better: Have there been any trade controversies between Malaysia and Singapore or between Indonesia and Singapore? Are they trying to eliminate tariffs? Are there products that they maintain trade barriers on? The paper then has sections where you answer the questions, you use the categories of comparison to form the organization of your paper. Then your paper might have this type of organization:
·
Introduction
·
Indonesia
in Multilateral Forums
·
Malaysia
in Multilateral Forums
·
Indonesian-Singapore
Trade Issues
·
Malaysia-Singapore
Trade Issues
·
Conclusions
Here’s another topic: Rural vs Urban Voting Patterns in Thailand and Japan. You want to see if there have been changes in those voting patterns since the late 1980s/early 1990s. As you research the topic you’ll begin to see some good categories of comparison, such as:
·
Results
of rural and urban voting since the late 1980s (Are there any identifiable
patterns of urban and rural voting in Japan and Thailand?)
·
Party
identification of rural and urban voters (Do urban and rural voters identify with
a single party or a set of parties?)
·
Key
issues for rural vs. urban voters (Are there specific issues that rural voters
prioritize or that urban voters prioritize?)
So let’s say you pick the first two categories. You’ll wind up with a paper that has the following organization.
·
Introduction
·
Voting
Patterns of Rural and Urban Voters in Parliamentary Elections since 1990 (the
category of comparison or the question asked)
o
Thailand:
The Traditional Rural Vote vs. the Urban Middle Class (the answer for the Thailand
case)
o
Japan:
Traditional dominance of rural voters (The answer for the Japan case)
·
Party
Identification
o
Thailand:
Red Shirt vs. Yellow Shirt (the answer for the Thailand case)
o
Japan:
LDP vs. a Two-Party System (The answer for the Japan case)
·
Conclusions
Of course, ask me for help on this if you have questions. That’s why I’m here.
Up until the rough draft deadline indicated on the syllabus I will look at anything you’d like me to look at regarding the paper. Anything from outlines, bibliographic sources, or even completed drafts can be turned in for comment up until that date. I will go over what you have, mark it up, and if you like give you a hypothetical grade. You can then make revisions based on my comments.
Ask me! If you have a question on where to find
sources or if you need a specific source and you can’t find it, ask me. This is what I do for a living. I have everything!
1. Books:
You may not have access to a library, so it may be impossible for you to use
books for this research. If so, just ignore this paragraph. How to start looking for sources. Start with
books in the library. Use a keyword search in the library catalogue. There is an advanced search function there
that will allow you to put in several key words. For example, if you’re researching internet
censorship in Malaysia and Singapore, you might use key words that combine
“Malaysia” with “internet”; “social media”; “censorship”; “technology” and then
use the same set of combinations for “Singapore” or “Asia” or “Southeast Asia”
to get edited volumes that may have a chapter on Singapore or Malaysia. Use
different key word combinations.
2. Library:
Same here. Ignore this if you are unable
to access the library due to the virus. Use the Library: Really!!!! Here’s what I mean: Library
3. Use
the same search terms in http://scholar.google.com. It will get you scholarly work, think tanks reports, and
journals rather than the Wikipedia entry. A regular google search will
get you lots of things, but many of them will not be scholarly, and of limited
use to you. Many
journals are available through the VCU system and you can search through the
VCU library, but you may also try Google Scholar (There it is again.
Freaky). Use this instead of a regular
search on any search engine.
4. Don’t
start your research with a general google search. That will get you a thousand sources, but the
quality of the sources is really in question: everything from a Wikipedia page
that might have inaccuracies to a middle school paper on the issue that a
teacher required students to post on line to a piece of political propaganda
which deliberately gives you false information as way of bashing someone’s
political enemies. It wastes your
time. A search like this may be useful
just to give a broad background on a subject. It may help you find the right
keywords to use in the scholarly resources.
Try it yourself. Do a general
google search using a set of keywords then compare that to a scholar.google.com
search with the same keywords. The first
is not so useful, the second gives you about ¾ of the info you need for your
paper in under one second.
5. A
regular google search may be useful if it leads you to think tanks that produce
scholarly research. See a list of think tanks below. I will be updating
this from time to time.
6. Keywords: For
any kind of search keywords are important. You may have to do a few searches
before you find the right keywords that get you all the good sources. Always
try a few combinations to see what you get. For example, let’s just pick
a topic (probably not relevant not any of your research): If you were looking
for books or scholarly articles on Indian’s nuclear weapon strategy, you might
use several combinations of these:
·
“India”
·
“nuclear weapons”
·
“nuclear strategy”
·
“nuclear doctrine”
·
“ICBM” (intercontinental ballistic missile)
·
“SLBM” (submarine launched ballistic missile)
Then you might learn a bit about India’s nuclear weapons
while you do the search itself. You’d learn that there is an Indian ICBM
called the Agni, so you might add that to the keyword search.
Then you might learn that India’s SLBMs are in a series called K (named
after APJ Abdul Kalam, the scientist considered to be the father of
India’s nuclear program). As of 2018, India is developing its K-4 and K-5
systems, so you might add “K-4” and “K-5” to the keywords.
8. Many journals are available through the VCU system and you can search through the VCU library, but you may also try Google Scholar (There it is again. Freaky). Use this instead of a regular search on any search engine. It will get you scholarly work, think tanks reports and journals rather than the Wikipedia entry. One way to use google.scholar is to use key words for the president, the issue, and then the name of one of the journals listed below. After doing that, then a search under the president and the issue might get you some other sources, but they are likely not as good. So, for example, search under “India, Trade, Asian Survey” and you get a boatload of articles from Asian Survey and other journals as well. A good list of journals is here. Some of the best journals on Asia include the following. The VCU libraries have almost all of these in text or available on line). The best are indicated with an asterisk
·
******Asian Survey (Best in the world; start here)
·
ASEAN Economic Bulletin
·
Asian Affairs
·
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African
Studies
·
China: An International Journal
·
China Economic Journal
·
*The China Quarterly
·
The China Journal
·
*Chinese Journal of International Relations
(Chinese perspectives)
·
Contemporary Japan
·
*Contemporary Southeast Asia
·
The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies
·
Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies
·
European Journal of East Asian Studies
·
The Journal of Asian Studies
·
India Journal of Asian Affairs
·
India Review
·
Indian Journal of Political Science
·
Indonesia
·
*International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
·
*Issues and Studies (China and Taiwan)
·
Journal of Asian History
·
The Journal of Asian Studies
·
Journal of Chinese Political Science
·
Journal of Contemporary China
·
Journal of Current Chinese
Affairs
·
Journal of East Asian Studies
·
The
Journal of Korean Studies
·
Journal of the Oriental Society of Australia
·
Journal
of Southeast Asian Studies
·
*Japan
Review
·
Modern Asian Studies
·
Modern China
·
*Pacific Affairs
·
Political Economy Journal of India
·
Sino-Japanese Studies
·
Social Science Journal Japan
·
Southeast
Asian Affairs
·
Southeast Review of Asian Studies
·
Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs
9. Think Tanks: These are research organizations that produce articles and books on foreign policy issues. They are excellent resources, but slightly different from academic sources. Generally, they are specifically focused on policy and intended to make recommendations for US policy (very good for this assignment). They might also have explicit political orientations. Unlike most academic work, think tanks can lean liberal or conservative. That doesn’t mean their arguments should be discounted. It just means that you should be aware that something you’re reading comes from a specific point of view. There are more than these and I will add them as I find them. The best are:
·
Brookings
Institution: Non-profit organization that watches over world
political trends and also includes many former government officials
·
Council
on Foreign Relations: The most prestigious non-profit
organization that examines foreign affairs and national security. It publishes
the journal Foreign Affairs
·
Rand
Corporation: US government funded think-tank, but its reports
are designed to analyze government policy, not justify it. (In other words, it
is honest analytically).
Excellent
Ones are
·
International Crisis Group: https://www.crisisgroup.org:
This is the best thing that exists on current international crises.
·
American Enterprise Institute (AEI): leans conservative, but is not too
ideological
·
Arms Control Association (ACA): Non-profit organization that watches
over world military trends; it has a decidedly pro-arms control attitude
·
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BSCIA):
The Kennedy School of Government (Harvard University) does some of the best
analyses of international affairs and national security and publishes the best
journal on international affairs, International Security, which can
be accessed online through the VCU online journal systems.
·
Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs:
Focuses on Human Rights issues.
·
Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace: One of the biggest and best.
It is a non-profit organization, which studies international affairs and has a
huge number of programs. It sponsors scholarly research on
everything form non-proliferation to building civil society. See the
list of "Programs" on the home page.
·
Carter
Center: Former President Carter established this Center to
examine international issues, host conferences, and mediate international
conflicts.
·
Cato
Institute: Right of center think tank that conducts research on
foreign policy, national security, and economic policy, as well as domestic
political issues.
·
Center for American Progress (think
tank with links to the Democratic Party)
·
Center
for National Policy (non-partisan center which does some
national security work)
·
Center for Non-proliferation Studies (CNS) at
the Monterrey Institute of International Studies, which is one of the best sources
on information on the spread of weapons of mass destruction
·
Center for Strategic and International Affairs (CSIS):
attached to Georgetown University. It produces reports on national security,
and is filled with ex-government officials
·
Coalition
to Reduce Nuclear Danger: A center-left organization that
focuses on US and international nuclear weapons policy.
·
Columbia International Affairs Online (CIAO):
Columbia University’s compilation of papers, journals, web sites, and other
resources on international affairs. It’s no a think tank itself, but
collects information from think tanks, government, and other academic circles
on international affairs and national security. You may need to use your VCU
password and login to get into this system. It has a specific link to Working
Papers from various think tanks and scholarly institutes.
·
Council
for a Livable World: Center-left in its ideology and focuses on
ways to reduce the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and reign in US
defense expenditures and deployments.
·
Federation of American Scientists (FAS): Non-profit organization that watches
over world military trends
·
Global Security.Org (excellent
resources for international diplomatic, military, and political issues)
·
Heritage
Foundation: Right of center think tank that conducts research on
foreign policy, national security, and economic policy, as well as domestic
political issues.
·
Hudson
Institute: Center-right think tank that conducts research on
foreign policy, national security, and economic policy, as well as domestic
political issues.
·
Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA): Non-profit think tank that does a lot
of work for the US government on national security issues. Much of its research
is available online.
·
Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis (IDSA):
A think tank that looks at many international security issues, particularly
east and South Asia. It is an Indian institute based in New Delhi.
·
International
Republican Institute (Republican Party-affiliated organization
that analyzes world affairs and supports programs that help nations make the
transition to democracy)
·
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (Democratic
Party-affiliated organization that analyzes world affairs and supports programs
that help nations make the transition to democracy)
·
National
Endowment for Democracy: A private, non-profit
organization that is funded by the US Congress. Its goal is to foster
democracy around the world through programs and research
·
National
Security Archive: This is a non-profit organization that gets
the US government to declassify documents relating to US foreign affairs
(through Freedom of Information Act requests) then makes those documents
available to the public. Some are available on line. All are available at the
Archive itself (In George Washington University’s library. You can contact the
Archive and make an appointment to go there.) Some are also available to
purchase in sets.
·
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC):
Non-profit organization that watches over world military trends
·
New
America Foundation (centrist think tank that looks at
domestic and international issues)
·
Nixon Center: Non-Profit organization that
studies foreign and national security policy, leans toward republican ideas
·
Nuclear
Threat Initiative (non-profit, non-partisan group that
analyzes and lobbies on nuclear proliferation issues)
·
Project for a New American Century: New
think tank that espouses and develops neoconservative views.
·
Project on Defense Alternatives (center-left)
·
Henry
L. Stimson Center: Non-profit organization that watches over
world political and military trends, in particular United Nations peace
operations
·
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI):
Non-profit organization that watches over world military trends
·
Western
States Legal Foundation: A pro-arms control group watching over
US defense expenditures and deployments and their impact on the public among
other things
·
Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars: Supports scholarly
research on a number of international topics. In particular, its Cold War International History Project provides
support for scholars using declassified documents to understand what was really
going on in Washington and Moscow during the Cold War.
·
Union of Concerned Scientists: Center-left
in its ideology and focuses on ways to reduce the proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction and reign in US defense expenditures and deployments.
·
United States Institute for Peace (USIP); Funded by the US Congress, it is a
non-partisan organization that sponsors and published research concerning
conflict prevention and conflict resolution
10.
Citation Tracing: Don’t forget one
of the best ways to find good sources. Say you found a great article on exactly
the issue you’re researching. That article
will have footnotes, endnotes, parenthetical references, and a
bibliography. Find those articles and
books. Use them. They are almost guaranteed to be useful
because the author of the great article you just read must have found them
useful.
11.
The Web: You cannot do
this type of research only on the web.
Do not expect to be able to sit in front of your computer and find the
information you need to write this paper.
It is not on the web. You must
use books and scholarly articles (that you might access through the web, but
they are not websites that will come up in a google search. They will, however,
be accessible through scholar.google.com – actual links to them if you search
on a VCU computer). If you try to do your research juts on the web using web
search engines, you’ll be wasting your time. You’ll search and search the web
for information that is simply not there and you’ll come to me the week before
the paper is due and say something like: “I can’t find any information on
Malaysian or Thai policies on the South China Sea. I might cry.
There are great scholarly articles and books on the subject, but they
are not likely to be available on the web.
Remember that the primacy purpose of the internet is advertising (even
what passes for information is really advertising its information). The web
tells you that everything you need is on the web. That is not true. It is especially not true when it comes to
scholarly research.
12.
A Warning about
the Web:
I don't think I need to tell you much about the web. In college I wrote papers
on a manual typewriter and I took my SATs on stone tablets. But if you do have
any questions about it let me know. An important note about internet sites:
what is crucial about any webpage is that you and I know what the source of the
information is. All information on the web is not equal. Before you trust any
information on the web you must know who runs the websites. Who is the source
of the information? The Chinese Communist Party has many web sites. Their information is probably not a source
you want to use for research on repression of Tibetan and Uighur minorities in
China. So you need to know who runs the site, and you need to tell me that in
the citations (see below)
Read this. Pay attention to it, or face everlasting doom! Failure to pay attention to this will likely result in a grade of D.
The following is not just because I want to annoy you or because I like to have things done my way. The following is because this is a class where you will do social science research and the rules of social science research are different from the rules of English composition or journalism. Learning how to write for different audiences and in different styles is part of the university experience.
You must use an established format for citations and your bibliography. You need to learn how to reference information properly, and how to write a bibliography with the correct and complete information before you leave VCU. This is easy to do, but more important than you think. Whether you go into academia or business you will be judged on the quality of your information, and that means people will want to know where you found your information. They will judge you at first, before they read your text, on your bibliography and citations. If you do it wrong while at VCU, you’ll get a deduction from your grade. If you do this in graduate school or government or the business world, you will be asked to go home and not come back (as in “you’re fired”).
It does not matter to me what format you use, as long as you use an established standard format for the social sciences. You can use footnotes or endnotes or parenthetical references, but you must learn to do it correctly. Here are web resources that will teach you to do this:
·
Chicago Manual of Style Quick
Guide This is probably the best
thing to use for footnote/endnote, and bibliographic style. It’s easy and
clear.
·
You
can use scholar.google.com another way.
If you found the book or article on this page, you’ll see that
underneath the small paragraph on the source is a link for “cite”. Click on that and it will you give several
already formatted citations. You can do
that even if you didn’t originally find the source on scholar.google.com. Just go to the page and search for it there,
then click the “cite” link. The properly formatted citation can be copied and
pasted directly into you bibliography. Remember, however, that these are
bibliographic formats. Footnotes and
endnotes are slightly different and have different page number rules that are
discussed below. That is very important.
·
Easy Bib
·
Bibme
·
Purdue OWL (Online Writing
Workshop)
·
Endnotes (and footnote
style). This is an article that I wrote which has endnotes that you can use as
a template. It also includes a
bibliography that you can use as a template.
Endnote and footnote citation style are the same. The only difference is
where you place them in the text.
Microsoft word allows you to choose endnotes or footnotes and to switch
one to the other if you like. Ask me if
you have questions on how to do this.
·
Parenthetical
References This
is a link to an article I wrote which can be used as a template for citing
using parenthetical references. Note in the citations that the author’s name
and publication date is within the parentheses (and page numbers if available).
You may have to sign in to get the article.
Since I have instructed you to pay attention to notation and
bibliographic style, and have provided you with a specific place to look for
the proper styles, I will take points
off of your paper if you do not do this in the correct manner. This is
simple. If you do not do it correctly it means one or both of the following: 1)
you are not taking the assignment seriously or are too lazy to do the paper
correctly; and/or 2) you are doing the paper at the last minute. Both of these
are good reasons why you will not get the grade you are able to earn.
Warning! What
not to do. I realize that in many cases
instructors in ENGL 200 are telling you to include reference material in the
text of the paper. However, this is exactly the wrong way to reference in
social science. What I mean is the following.
In doing research there are three basic types of things you
must cite: quotes, specific information, and other people’s ideas. Other people’s ideas are covered above under
plagiarism. See the section on quotes,
but that shouldn’t be a big issue here.
This is a small paper and you should avoid quotes. When I say specific information, what I refer
to is any information which is not general knowledge. For example, you would not need to use a
citation if you state that Henry Kissinger was Richard Nixon’s National
Security Adviser in Nixon’s first term (general knowledge). But you would have to cite the fact that
Kissinger met with Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai on July 9, 1971 and any details
of the meeting. Another example: you would not need to cite that Chinese
economic reforms were first announced at the Third Plenum of the 11th
Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, but if you included
information on why Hua Guofeng’s attempt to establish his own Mao-like
authority had failed in part because his economic reform plan was not
farsighted enough and why this failure allowed Deng to push his reform plan
through the Central Committee, you’d need to cite the source (Schram 1984, 417)
or use a footnote[1] or
endnote[1]
If you are referring to specific information that you found on a specific page in a source (if the source has page numbers, unlike some web sources), you must include the page number where you found the information. This is true even for parenthetical references. Let’s say you found information in a book that is 450 pages long. Citing the book and not the page number is not very helpful for anyone who thought that the information was interesting and wanted to learn more about it. You’re forcing that person to scan through 450 pages of text to find the info. Instead, cite the page number and then the reader can just turn to that page number. This is the established method of citation. This is true even for parenthetical references. If you are citing the main point of an article or book or something as background information, you don’t need the page number, but if it is specific material it does need a page number.
You may use endnotes. You may use footnotes, but then the paper must be a bit longer since some of the page will be taken up by footnotes. In the social sciences, footnotes and endnotes are numbered consecutively. The first note is number 1; the second is number 2, etc. Microsoft Word will do this for you. You can use a source more than once in your paper. There are specific citation formats for the first citation and for the second citation. You can also put more than one source in a specific note. See my article for examples for all of this: Endnotes/Footnotes. A short reference follows:
·
Footnotes
and endnotes are numbered consecutively (1, 2, 3, 4…) (Please don’t use the
natural sciences-style that merges the bibliography and citations. This format lists the sources in a
bibliography and numbers them, then cites information in the text by listing the
number of the source used in the bibliography.
That format is for natural sciences and I have never seen it used in any
Political Science journal. Since this is
Political Science, you should learn how Political Science works.
This is the key to writing a good paper so I am providing detailed instruction on this. Political Science has a specific style of writing, especially when it comes to introductory paragraphs. It mirrors the style of government memoranda. In short, the introductory paragraph should summarize the paper and that includes giving the reader a summary of you conclusions. If you don’t do this, even a great paper, becomes a grade of B.
A good introductory paragraph
should include the following:
In other words, the introduction should provide your reader with a "road map" that explains exactly what you will say during the paper. This is not as difficult as it sounds. Basically, what you need to do is write the outline you have for your paper in sentences in the first few paragraphs of the paper. Your opening paragraph (or couple of opening paragraphs) should also give the reader some reason to be interested in your topic and in your argument. Tell the reader why this subject is important. Here is an example of an opening paragraph:
This essay examines the levels of media freedoms in Indonesia and Malaysia. For each nation, levels of government interference in print, television, and internet media are compared. In particular, special attention will be given to the changes in news media freedom during the recent political transitions: from dictatorship to democracy in Indonesia since 1998 and from the leadership of Mahathir Mohammed to Abdullah Badawi then Najib Razak in Malaysia. Both nations are experiencing more press freedom than they have in the past. In particular, Indonesia’s courts are striking down governmental attempts to sue media centers for reports critical of the government. In Malaysia, internet news is making attempts to censor the press nearly impossible. However, after improvement in press freedoms under Prime Minister Abdullah, the government of Prime Minister Najib has implemented many policies that inhibit media freedoms. At its most basic level, the difference between the two nation’s media environment is the difference between a nation becoming more democratic (Indonesia) and a nation still clinging to some authoritarian traditions (Malaysia).
You will then have a paper with subheadings such as this:
· Introduction
· Media freedom under Suharto in Indonesia
· Media freedom under Mahathir in Malaysia
· Media and the Democratic Transition in Indonesia
· Media and the Post-Mahathir Governments
· Conclusions: Media Freedom in Indonesian Democracy and Malaysian Soft Authoritarianism
As you make the points that support your argument, you'll probably be aware of the places in which your argument is controversial or in which a reasonable person might disagree with you. Preempt those controversies in your text. Point out what those opposing arguments might be, and why you think your point of view is more accurate or reasonable.
1.
Try
not to use quotes. I want your writing,
not anyone else’s. If there is a great
quote from a direct participant in the event, or an official document, a
phrase, or word, that you think really adds to the paper then a quote may be
appropriate here or there. But if you
have a paragraph-length quote in an eight page paper, that would be bad. I’d be sad and after you see your grade,
you’ll be sad too.
2.
Important:
Don’t quote general information that you found in a scholarly article and don’t
quote the conclusions of other scholars.
Paraphrase the information or the idea in your own words and then cite
the source.
3.
Do
not give me a sentence in your paper that quotes that information directly from
the source. For example, don’t quote
like this: “The United States included 20,000 troops.” It is basic factual
information and does not need to be quoted, but it does need to be cited. Even if it is an analyst’s opinion, it does
not need to be quoted. Just paraphrase
it in your words and cite the source.
4.
Reserve
quotes for direct participants: candidates and their staffers, or a voter. The exact words matter in these cases. In general though, go easy on quotes.
5.
Too
many quotes means that you’re just cutting and pasting, not writing. A
research paper is not a series of quotes rearranged the way you like. It doesn’t teach you anything and your
grade will suffer horribly, terribly, and painfully.
6.
So,
for example, if noted terrorist scholar Reed Richards says in his book that
“Al-Qaeda probably only consists of 10,000 people worldwide.” Do not give me a sentence in your paper that
reads: Reed Richards says that “Al-Qaeda probably only consists of 10,000
people worldwide.” Give me something
that says: One scholar estimates that al-Qaeda only has 10,000 active members
globally (Add the citation here which cites Richards’ book and the page number
in it where the information is found). The full bibliographic information will
be in the bibliography at the end of the paper.
Or if Ben Grimm concludes in his book that: “Al-Qaeda’s growth depends
on economic reform in the Middle East.
Elimination of poverty is not the biggest problem. Rather it is the
ability of the middle class to gain social and economic mobility.” Don’t quote that, but say: “Economic reforms
designed to allow the middle class to grow and prosper will be the key to
battling al-Qaeda in the future (Add the endnote, footnote, or parenthetical
reference here which cites Grimm’s book and the page number in it where the
information is found).
7.
In
a larger paper, but not in this one, sometimes quotes are useful. A good quote is this: According to Osama
bin-Laden, “for over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands
of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its
riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors,
and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight
the neighboring Muslim peoples” (Add the endnote here which cites Bin-Laden’s
fatwa and the page number in it where the information is found or the internet
URL). This is an excerpt from the 1998
fatwa of OBL. Bin-Laden is a
participant, a historical figure. His
exact words are important.
8.
In
any case: Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever cut and paste anything from a
source into your document unless you place it in quotes and cite the source of
the quote. And generally in a paper that
is under a few dozen papers, there is never a need to quote anything that is
not an official source. Why quote anything
unless the exact works are crucial? So
quoting a President or Foreign Minister or a witness to an event is useful, but
quoting a scholar or journalist is not.
First, never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever cut and paste anything from
a source into your document unless you place it in quotes and cite the source
of the quote. And generally in a paper that is under a few dozen papers, there
is never a need to quote anything that is not an official source. Why quote anything unless the exact works are
crucial. So quoting a President or
Foreign Minister or a witness to an event is useful, but quoting a scholar or
journalist is not. For the purposes of
this paper, there is no reason to quote anyone. The paper is too short for
quotes.
This is really not a fine line. Did you write the sentence or not? Did you come up with the idea or not? When in doubt, it’s relatively simple: never include something in your paper that you did not write unless it is quotes and then it also must be cited. Anything that is not your idea must be cited. Plagiarism is a violation of the VCU Honor Code and I will not hesitate to charge someone with a violation if I catch plagiarism. If you have questions about what is plagiarism, ask me or see VCU’s Writing Integrity Workshop.
But just because someone else has
already written an idea that you agree with 100% doesn't mean you can't discuss
it in your paper. Just point out whose idea it is; paraphrase it in your own
words, cite the source of the idea, and expand upon it. Generally, that is how
Political Science works. 90% of all Political Science articles and books do the
following (I give you another example that is not topically relevant to the
class):
There are various explanations for
the
The article would then outline the theories of Barton, Rogers, and Romanoff, analyze each one, and then develop the fourth theory. There is no problem as long as Barton, Rogers, and Romanoff get credited with developing their theories, and the fourth theory is yours. If the fourth theory belongs to a fourth author (Banner? Stark? Hill?), the author should be credited and your article will show why his theory is superior to the other three. The point here is that you may find sources which have different opinions on an issue.
If paraphrasing an idea: make sure to change the verb you use so it is different from the verb used in the source. Make sure you change everything but the proper nouns. So let’s say, you’ve read this in your source: “The President phoned the Prime Minister immediately after he received the news.” That may be the point you want to make in your paper, but you shouldn’t quote that and can’t copy it (or you’d be plagiarizing). The only words you really can use here would be “President” and “Prime Minister.” These are the proper nouns. So put it into your own words. How about: “Once the President had been informed, he contacted the Prime Minister.” And then cite the source of the information. That would not be a quote problem or a suspicion of plagiarism
And
never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever cut and paste anything from a source into
your document unless you place it in quotes and cite the source of the
quote. (He said it again! And in
italics! Must mean something!) (And it’s in bold, and italics, and red; maybe I
should pay attention to this.)
1. Margins and Font. Papers should be doubled-spaced with one-inch margins, and reasonable sized font (11 point). Shorter pages with wide margins and large print size font will be penalized.
2. Subject and Verb. Make sure you have a subject and verb in every sentence. (You would be surprised how many important journals and books allow non-sentence sentences). This is non-fiction, not fiction. So you need to observe the basic rules of grammar. A long sentence is not necessarily a better sentence -- each sentence should express only one thought. Don't be afraid to break up a long sentence into two or three shorter ones. It will usually flow better that way.
3. Official Titles Provide someone’s title in the text the first time you mention them if they are an elected official (Tim Kaine, Governor of Virginia) or an appointed official (Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Paul Nitze). Thereafter, you can refer to them as Kaine or Nitze. So for the first mention, you’d say: “National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger told his assistant to.…” From that point on, you can simply say “Kissinger told his assistant to…” When you mention a senator or representative, say: Senator John Warner (R-VA) to introduce and after than you can just say Warner or Senator Warner.
4. Back up. WHEN YOU TYPE YOUR PAPER ON A COMPUTER MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A BACKUP DISK WITH THE PAPER ON IT. AS YOU TYPE THE PAPER SAVE THE FILE TO THE BACKUP DISK EVERY TEN MINUTES OR SO. Don’t just leave it on your hard drive and hope it will be safe. A super safe way to deal with this is to use your own, already built-in cloud system. Email the drafts of your paper to yourself and then you know it will be safe on the VCU system and you can access it from anywhere on the planet. Also, remember that if you type on the university computers be careful. Putting your paper on the hard drive in the computer lab is risky – they sweep the hard drives of files at night. Keep a backup copy for yourself. I have several backup copies of anything I write. You don't ever want to lose work because you didn't back it up.
5. No Wikipedia. Do not use Wikipedia or any other web-based encyclopedia. It is unreliable and you should have stopped using encyclopedias for research in elementary school.
6. Reliability of the Internet. Be careful about internet sources. Make sure the source is reliable. Remember that anyone can post anything on the internet. There aren’t necessarily any editors or fact checkers. For example, there is a website that links me to the Kennedy assassination; I was two years old. Ask me if you have questions about this (internet sources, not if I was involved in the Kennedy assassination; I wasn’t).
7. The use of “I”: Try to avoid using “I” in non-fiction. Instead of “I will discuss three problems…” say “This essay addresses three problems…”
8. The use of a semicolon: Semicolons connect two complete sentences that are related to each other. For example: “I went to the pizzeria to get a pie; it was closed so I had Chinese food instead.” You could also write them as two separate sentences if you wanted. The following would be an incorrect use of a semicolon: “I had six very tasty pizzas last week; except for that crappy one from the big chain store.” That should be a comma, not a semicolon. The test is this: If the two sentences you are connecting with a semicolon could stand alone as complete sentences then use a semicolon. So it becomes obvious: “Except for that crappy one from the big chain store” is not a sentence.
9. The use of “however”: This trips everyone up. It’s a bit similar to semicolons. “I went to the pizzeria; however, when I got there, it was closed.” Notice the semicolon, not the comma. That’s because “When I got there, it was closed” could be a complete sentence by itself. Also, this sentence is like the use of a semicolon. You are connecting two complete sentences. In this case, you’re connecting two sentences that are related, but related in a very specific way. The second sentence is adding the “however” to show a different expectation than the first sentence implies. The first sentence implies you were going to eat pizza. The second sentence says you didn’t. On the other hand, look at this example: “I went to the pizzeria. Upon arriving, however, I found out it was closed.” The “however” is surrounded by commas. That’s because “upon arriving” is not a sentence by itself. Here’s another aspect of this. “I went to the pizzeria, the one with the best pizza in the world.” There is a comma there because “the one with the best pizza in the world” is not a sentence by itself. These are the non-fiction rules. In fiction, you can do anything you want.
10. Some useful rules:
1. Numbers under 100 should be written as out. So you would not have this sentence. “President Bush met with 3 advisers.” It would be “President Bush met with three advisers.”
2. When you have an acronym, such as NSDD-75 or UN. First write out the name in full: National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 75, or United Nations (UN). After that first use of the term, use the acronym.
The papers are due at midnight on the day indicated on the syllabus. Email the paper to me. This is a soft deadline so a few hours late won’t matter. If I still don’t have it by morning, it will be late. I will mark late papers down ONE GRADE for each day late. That means that an almost perfect paper -- one that I would give 98 points to -- becomes an 88 if one day late, 78 if two days late, etc,... all the way down to 8 points if nine days late, and zero points if ten days late.
Talk to me if you are having some medical, family personal problems. If there is a serious need to get an extension on the paper, I will give you an extension. I do realize that there are more important things in life than this class and this assignment. That is especially true now during this health crisis. So if you run into a problem, talk to me. Computer problems do not count as a problem that warrants an extension. If you are writing your paper at the last minute and you have a problem, the moral of the story is that you should not have been writing your paper at the last minute. If you have some kind of computer problem, and you are not writing your paper at the last minute, let me know. Maybe I can help.
[1] Stuart Schram. “Economics in Command? Ideology and Policy since the Third Plenum, 1979-1984.” The China Quarterly 99 (September 1984): 417.
[1] Stuart Schram. “Economics in Command? Ideology and Policy since the Third Plenum, 1979-1984.” The China Quarterly 99 (September 1984): 417.