F I N A L Grades:

Points: 2 5.00 20.00 20.00
10.00




10.00 7.00 15.00
89.00
<<<<<<<<<<<< Dlv #4 Points >>>>>>>>>>>>
Last 5 Digits of V Id Pop Quiz #1 Sketch Fulfillment Sequence P1D1 – Part #1 User Auth P1D1 Part #2 A&A and Table Maint P1D2 - System Description & Details to Account for Startup P1D2 Critique P1D3 - MS Project Plan P1D3 Critique IS A IS B IS CORE Exit Exam Total Exit Exam Points P1D4 – Good Looking Trial Balance P1D4 - Final Submit
Points At Posting Pct At Posting Final Grade
Good Looking Trial Balance at Ledger Engine (7)
Table Maintenance for BE, GS, Ledger w/ FK & Code Lookup (2) GS Table has Goods / Services for Enterprise (2) Has Trial Balance Report that Agrees with Ledger Engine (2) Order Entry Works, has been Improved, Limits Sales Person to Sell only (5) Menu for Manager and Sales Persons (2) Take-on Customers Works (2) Dlv #4 Points
05724 1.50 5.00 20.00 19.00 Class diagram/ERD confusion, ERD doesn't show one-to-many relationships, otherwise would be exemplary stuff if it fit on the printed page. 9.00 Very clear, sparse sketch, resembles project, lumps all end tasks as 'use ledger engine', doesn't show what needs to be built 51 48 45 144 8.00 7.00 9.00
78.50 88% B
7
2 2 0 2 1 2 9
07269 1.50 5.00 20.00 20.00 Really elegant, minimal stuff here, no wasted effort, no apparent effects of haste. 10.00 Very clear all the way thru the end 34 45 36 115 6.39 7.00 12.00
81.89 92% A
7
2 2 0 5 2 1 12
08347 2.00 5.00 18.00 19.50 Class diagram is missing components for Dlv #4, all that's there appears accurate very quickly. 8.00 Oveall shaped OK, zero attempt to detail end tasks 61 52 55 168 9.33 6.00 12.00
79.83 90% A
6
2 2 0 4 2 2 12
13255 1.75 5.00 20.00 20.00 Easy to see it's dead-on, all very clear stuff. 9.00 Resembles the project except for Dlv #4, which is generic 'work', doesn't detail the components 50 51 58 159 8.83 7.00 13.00
84.58 95% A
7
3 2 2 4 1 1 13
13370 1.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 Clear, all appears accurate. 9.00 End tasks not well defined 48 55 54 157 8.72 7.00 11.00
81.72 92% A
7
2 2 0 4 2 1 11
15978 2.00 5.00 20.00 18.50 Late, otherwise fine job, class diagram is missing stuff to pitch a JV. 10.00 Fine job 54 46 38 138 7.67 7.00 12.00
82.17 92% A
7
2 2 0 4 2 2 12
16763 1.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 Very clear stuff. I'm wondering about 'buy material' debiting 1030, but didn't dock for it, caution against using accounts that should only accept closing entries... 10.00 Exceptionally clear all the way thru the end 46 41 44 131 7.28 7.00 7.50
77.78 87% B
7
2 1.5 0 3 1 0 7.5
20559 2.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 Aggh! Crossed lines is all I can snipe at, no points docked. All appears accurate quickly, needed a magnifier to see tables on the printed doc. 10.00 Exceptionally well-detailed 44 52 54 150 8.33 7.00 11.00
83.33 94% A
7
2 2 0 4 2 1 11
20823 2.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 Exceedingly clear stuff 9.00 OK on resubmit 49 60 48 157 8.72 6.00 10.00
80.72 91% A
6
2 2 0 4 1 1 10
24948 1.00 5.00 20.00 13.00 Late. Sample data appears accurate, but Trial Balance is a fiction, not related to the Details. Use Case diagram is not accurate for this semester's project, shows Customer as using the system. Class diagram is missing components needed for Dlv #4. Database ERD is not accurate, doesn't show one-to-many relationships as requested. 9.00 Overall shaped fine, end tasks not well defined 21 33 25 79 4.39 0.00 3.00
55.39 62% D
0
2 0 0 1 0 0 3
26109 2.00 5.00 20.00 17.00 Class and ERD don't document names used in the application or its database. ERD misses one-to-many relationships requested. Small errors in Details, extensions not calc'd correctly, but Trial Balance is close to accurate 9.00 Clear until Dlv #4 34 38 39 111 6.17 7.00 12.00
78.17 88% B
7
2 2 0 4 2 2 12
30153 1.50 5.00 20.00 20.00 Elegant, thorough, rings true quickly, only misses taking partner's money, didn't dock for that. 12.00 Over the top, best details, best summaries, reeks of complete understanding of the project and its tasks 48 61 64 173 9.61 7.00 13.00
88.11 99% A
7
2 2 0 5 2 2 13
32341 1.75 5.00 20.00 16.00 Owner/Manager doesn't inherit Sales functions, database ERD doesn't show one-to-many relationships, problems with columns widths, and doesn't show 'the tables populated with sample data' or a trial balance calculated with reference to them. Instead is showing the tabular report with red headline that says 'this is not the tables populated with sample data'. 9.00 End tasks not detailed, otherwise resembles the project 60 62 66 188 10.44 7.00 11.00
80.19 90% A


 
 


0
34621 1.50 5.00 20.00 18.00 Late. Class diagram is incomplete, doesn't show objects to make Dlv #4 work, is OK arrangement of the Visual Studio class diagram. Database ERD doesn't show the one-to-many relationships requested, and the relationships aren't drawn accurately, although putting the Details at the center of the thing is a good concept. Sample data, Details, Trial Balance appear accurate. 9.00 Clear except for Dlv #4 tasks 31 37 33 101 5.61 6.00 12.00
77.11 87% B


 
 


0
39908 1.00 5.00 20.00 16.00 OK at resubmit. Printed copy arrived late. Details don't have OrderId, Paid-in Capital is not stated correctly in the Trial Balance, Details reference accounts not shown in Trial Balance 9.75 Detailed enough to see missing XMIT JV for Dlv #4 34 28 40 102 5.67 7.00 12.00
76.42 86% B
7
2 2 0 5 2 1 12
47458 1.50 5.00 20.00 16.00 Showed corrected document 8/3. Database ERD doesn't show one-to-many relationships as requested. GS table is missing an entry for Cash, and has Paid in Capital incorrectly coded. Orders only have one detail, and Details don't show the ledger account at all. Is overall clear, would be easy to patch. 9.00 Didn't provide a Gant, used a very well-done grid instead. Missing detailed tasks for Dlv #4 43 45 31 119 6.61 7.00 10.00
75.11 84% B
7
2 2 0 3 1 2 10
49325 2.00 5.00 20.00 17.00 Late. Class diagram is directly from Visual Studio without any arrangement showing relationships. ERD has hand-drawn elements. Tables with sample data appear accurate, Trial balance relates to the Details. 10.00 Shows clear understanding of rubric, all the way thru Dlv #4 42 42 37 121 6.72 7.00 11.00
78.72 88% B
7
2 2 0 4 2 1 11
50628 1.75 5.00 20.00 17.00 Showed corrected doc 8/2. Fit/finish problems where doc doesn't fit the page. Details table data is jumbled, appears to be inaccurate when un-jumbled, Trial balance doesn't relate to the details. 9.00 Well done until Dlv #4, shows none of the components that need to be built 62 62 54 178 9.89 7.00 13.00
82.64 93% A
7
2 2 0 5 2 2 13
52297 1.50 5.00 20.00 20.00 Quickly rings true. 9.00 Shaped OK, end tasks not well defined 50 50 50 150 8.33 7.00 11.50
82.33 93% A
7
2 2 0 3.5 2 2 11.5
53167 2.00 5.00 20.00 19.50 Dead-on, rough stuff, no wasted effort. Class diagram is missing components needed for Dlv #4. 9.50 Very concise WBS, doesn't define end tasks for Dlv #4 except 'finish up scripting', is missing key components 37 37 34 108 6.00 7.00 12.00
81.00 91% A
7
2 2 0 4 2 2 12
59912 1.50 5.00 18.00 19.75 ERD has no crow's feet or other one-to-many sign, otherwise this all rings true quickly. 9.00 Dlv #4 tasks not well detailed 47 46 43 136 7.56 6.00 9.00
75.81 85% B
6
2 2 0 2 1 2 9
60355 2.00 5.00 20.00 19.75 Exemplary stuff, some scratches about the Class Diagram which would quickly be made more consistent, otherwise evidences understanding of the project. 10.00 Excellent rendering of the project, including end tasks for Dlv #4 45 56 56 157 8.72 7.00 16.00
88.47 99% A
7
3 2 2 5 2 2 16
61036 1.00 5.00 20.00 18.00 Way late, mostly appears accurate, has hand-drawn database ERD, column's not wide enough to show cash or equity balances. 9.00 Well-formed, no details for Dlv #4. 48 40 51 139 7.72 7.00 13.00
80.72 91% A
7
2 2 0 5 2 2 13
62946 2.00 5.00 20.00 18.00 Showed up way late, excellent when it got here. 12.00 This is over the top, really. 47 43 58 148 8.22 0.00 11.00
76.22 86% B


 
 


0
68047 2.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 Minor scratches about the Class Diagram, none that detract from full points on first submit. 9.50 All but end tasks are very clear 49 50 47 146 8.11 6.00 12.00
82.61 93% A
6
2 2 0 5 2 1 12
70772 2.00 5.00 20.00 19.00 Late, otherwise demos understanding of the project, sample data, Details & Trial Balance appear accurate. 9.25 Overall very fine, no specific end tasks 61 53 55 169 9.39 7.00 12.00
83.64 94% A
7
2 2 0 5 2 1 12
71827 1.00 5.00 20.00 16.00 Late. Class diagram doesn't document the app built, is incomplete, doesn't include control classes for JV &c. No GS there to pay the cook. This isn't a good scenario for this semester's prototype, should be 'mercantile' in nature. Data dictionary doesn't fit on page. Sample data appears accurate 10.00 Well done, found the Cost column 38 30 39 107 5.94 6.00 10.00
73.94 83% B
6
2 2 0 3 1 2 10
74690 1.50 5.00 20.00 20.00 Rings true quickly. 9.00 End not well detailed. 50 42 50 142 7.89 7.00 10.00
80.39 90% A
7
2 2 0 4 1 1 10
78415 0.00 5.00 20.00 16.00 Diagrams appear accurate. GS table shows item costing 12,000 with price of 350. Details are miscoded, debit to cash for equity exchange is incorrect. 9.00 Well sketched project until Dlv #4 which shows none of what needs to be built. Included several blank printed sheets. 26 26 24 76 4.22 5.00 8.00
67.22 76% C
5
2 2 0 2 0 2 8
80624 1.00
0.00
Nothing shown for anything, only answered one roll call. I hope you can get a retro-D or W, will support it.

0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 1% F


 
 


0