F I N A L Grades as at Saturday the 15th at 4:25:


INFO202 F I N A L Grades

15 5
20
20 5 5 10 10

10 10 30 110 ← Points without Exam



Secret Word Quiz 1 - Survey eBusiness Legacy Proj 1, One Valid Page XHTML/CSS to Specs Proj 1 Comments Proj 2 Valid Strict XHTML, CSS Project 2 Comments Quiz 2, XHTML, CSS, Structure, OO, &c... Includes 2 Point Curve Proj 3, 1st JavaScript Proj 3, extra Java- Script Project 4, DBMS, Demo 2 MySQL Queries in Lab Project 5, Demo Visual Studio or VS Express ASP in Lab Visual Studio 1st Bonus 5 Points Visual Studio 2nd Bonus 5 Points Quiz 3 Exit Exam 7 thru10 points by Quartile plus Survey 2 Pts Exam Points % of Points Grade Exit Exam Raw Exit Exam Q'tile Reflection
google 14 5 Good adaptation of sample stuff, validates fine, good start on Project #2 19.5 Has SiteThumb, is short of semantic markup demo, meets other specs with OK adaptation of sample. 14 5 5 10 10 5
9 11
107.5 98% A  62  3 Bright fellow, can do it all, very quick on the uptake
god of war 9 7 Investigating borders, good Project #1 and topic for Project #2 22 Fine job, meets specs, plus SiteThumb bonus 15.5 5
10 10

10 10
98.5 90% A  - 
I hope you'll stay in our INFO program, don't recollect the details of our conversations, but do recollect you're considering blending INFO with or as an add-on to another degree? This stuff is very easy for you, and you'll be a welcome addition to our program.
karly 10.25 7 Enthusiastic response for Project #1, exploring stuff beyond the specs, good topic for Project #2 22 Enthusiastic vehicular homage, requested photobucket to hold excess imagery, SiteThumb bonus 12.25 5 5 10 10 5 5 8.5 9
109 99% A  66  3 Thanks so much for your office visits and the opportunity to talk a bit. I look forward to seeing you in other classes, and am pleased you catch on to this stuff so easily.
72993 4.5 5 Valid, good adaptation of samples, attention to style & color, good start on Project #2 21 Very appealing site, has SiteThumb, no transparency demo'd 15.25 5 5 10 10 5 5 8 10
103.75 94% A  56  2 Will be most welcome as an INFO major!
orange 9 5 Fine job, validates, meets specs 18 Didn't meet graphics on home page spec, no semantic markup, SiteThumb is there. 17 5 5 10 10

10 10
99 90% A  56  2 Thanks so much for your faithful attendance and attention in class. It's a pleasure getting you this Ace
puglove16 9.75 7 Validates fine, need to avoid sizing images on the page, doggie is distorted, fine topic for Project #2 19 No transparency demo'd, no SiteThumb, valid XHTML, good Navbar 14.25 5 5 10 10 5
10 10
105 95% A

Wow, your answers are a delight to read! They reflect superior intellect and attention to details, top few percent...
10cats 14.75 7 Fine job, validates, good topic for Project #2 19 SiteThumb not 80px, short on the paragraphs/semantic markup, otherwise fine reading of the specs 17.75 5 5 10 10 5
10 11
114.5 104% A  80  4 Thanks so much for considering INFO as an add-on to your other deep technical skills. Working with lab equipment is, of course, also working with the techs who make such a big difference in so many lives. Adding INFO to what you're doing could be a huge multiplier for your skills, and I hope to see you in our program.
mami ar 6.5 4.75 Missing alt tags, otherwise meets specs, really fine job 18 Ignored graphics size requirement, back page has no link back to home, no SiteThumb, enthusiastic investigation of stuff, made opacity work to demo transparency 12.5 5 5 10 10 5 5 9 9
99.75 91% A  64  3 Lots of style impressed into this intro stuff, is a pleasure seeing you add these tech skills to your other talents, and I wish you all the best.
CAESAR 14.75 3 Good topic, no attempt to constrain content to 880px, not using Strict model, doesn't validate 19 No SiteThumb, otherwise a fine reading of the specs except for the 'centered' part 19.5 5 5 10 10

10 12
108.25 98% A  60  2 I'm not sure how you ended up in INFO202 but am very pleased you did. There are usually a couple or a few students in your position, working toward a degree they didn't need to get where they are and for some it's been of great value either where they sit, or at the next opportunity.
Sharp43 14.25 4.75 Validates, might not be constraining content/only using short lines of text, using in-line styles 19 CSS isn't valid so there is no constraint on the container, short of paragraphs requirement, added SiteThumb 19.5 5 5 10 10 5
10 11
113.5 103% A  78  4 Catches on quick, excellent results, will be most welcome in INFO .
bosox 15 5 Valid, good topic 22 Demos all specs, plus SiteThumb 17.5 5 5 10


10 9
98.5 90% A  48  1 Appears to be retreading self own expense and likely to get the best value out of what we offer. It was a pleasure seeing you work with tech entirely new to you and catch onto it so well.
stuff 12 5 Validates, meets specs, good topic 17 Doesn't validate, short on paragraphs requirement, SiteThumb not 80ps, doesn't demo transparency, graphics blow past 80K limit. 8.25 5 5 10 10 5
10 12
99.25 90% A

Thanks for very good work over all, sorry about the Details in that quiz, would be much more pleased posting an Ace.
83618
7 Validates fine, good topic for Project #2 22 Meets specs well, SiteThumb bonus 19.5 5 5 10 10 5 5 10 11
109.5 100% A

Impressive speed at putting intro stuff into a very Pro result. Exceeds expectations here and will be a most welcome addition to our INFO program.
ploopy 10.25 5 Enthusiastic response, good topic, meets specs 20 Fine job, careful reading of specs, SiteThumb is not 80px 14.5 5 5 10 10 5
9.5 10
104.25 95% A  - 
A bright fellow, willing to work at stuff, catches on quickly, gets things done, impresses style into the work, and I hope to deliver more Aces to you in our courses.
ehplus 14.25 4 Forbidden, nothing there 16 Threw together a good idea. Doesn't meet graphics requirement, no transparency, does Validate
5 5 15 10 5
9 12 28 123.25 112% A  76  4 Talented yooung man, pulled this Ace off attending maybe two classes. 202 is probably the last course where an Ace can begot this way...
CompTIA 13.5 7 Enthusiastic exploration of style, good start on Project #2, taking on difficult task of one page working on phone and browser 22 Very enthusiastic project, exceeds specs, impresses lotsa style, plus SiteThumb 19.25 5 5 10 10 5 5 10 12
123.75 113% A  62  3 What a pleasure seeing your work and being able to observe some of your tech skills. I look forward to seeing more of you, know you're multi-talented and will have lots of options, would like to woo you to INFO!
guoh 13.75 4 Enthusiastic response for Project #1, good start on Project #2, is using in-line styles not in specs, has a few validation errors 19.5 Has SiteThumb, no semantic markup demo, meets most other specs and validates 17 5 5 10 10 5
9.5 11
109.75 100% A  66  3 This young man is going to be our best advertisement! Traveled great distance to be here, pays 100% attention to new stuff in new language filtered thru my Georgia drawl, and instantly puts it all to use, then enthusiastically translates stuff for his fellow countrymen.
3825 13.5 5 Found a good template to work with, validates fine, meets spec. Please 'fictionalize' your politician 20 Validates OK, meets specs, text spilling past divs detracts from a pro appearance. 21.5 5 5 15 10

10 12
117 106% A  90  4 Another of our brightest and best! Has put more INFO202 stuff into production quicker than anybody I've ever seen.
yankees 2 5 Validates fine, good adaptation of samples, good start on Project #2 21 Meets specs with adaptation of a sample, site validates. Mods 'broke' the div making scrollbars appear and divs overlap. 15.5 5 5 10 10 5 5 9 11
103.5 94% A  62  3 All the best wishes for this young gentleman, who I hope he catches on to what comes next as well as he did with this stuff.
36160 7.75 5 Fine job, validates, meets specs 19 Short of semantic markup, home page graphics don't meet spec, no SiteThumb 9.5 5 5 10 10 5 5 9.5 9
99.75 91% A  48  1 Thanks for good work, is greatly appreciated.
81922 13.5 5 Well done! 20 No SiteThumb, otherwise well-crafted pages 18.5 5 5 10 10

9.5 10
106.5 97% A  54  2 Facile with new stuff, can do anything we offer here, please stay in INFO and keep focused at the front of class!
capitals 15 5 Among the Best I get to see. 22 Has it all plus SiteThumb 21.25 5 5 10 10 10 5 10 12
130.25 118% A  74  4 Please stay in ISY! We've got lots of talented students leading the way, always need more. This guy is a genius.
Theo 13.5 5 Good adaptation of sample stuff, validates fine, good start on Project #2 22 Exceeds specs, puts out facts of the major, has SiteThumb 20 5 5 10 10

10 11
111.5 101% A  68  3 This young gentleman is going to leave VCU gold-plated! Please entertain that dual-major, or at least work thru most of our technical core. CPA + INFO makes the best earners on the way out.
JP 14 7 Valid page, Project #2 topic is fine, shows exploration of styles, pushing limits for Project #1 is good to see 18 Overall fine, short on paragraphs, SiteThumb not 80px. 19.25 5 5 10 10 5 5 10 12
120.25 109% A  50  2 Really, really sharp student, actively actualizing self thru technology, getting experience in clerical stuff, will be gold plated
Liberty 12.75 3 Trying to use properties in tags, not valid, needs to use styles. Good topic for Project #2 18 OK adaptation of sample, no transparency demo, no SiteThumb 19 5 5 10
10 5 17
104.75 95% A

Need to work a bit harder, keep hands on the tech if you're going on in INFO. Should have Aced this stuff, did get a lot of it working, and I hope I get to post one for you in another course.
18469 11.75 5 Enthusiastic response for Project #1 and start on Project #2, talented designer learning xhtml & css 22 Striking site, demos lots of exploration of web technique, has SiteThumb 16.25 5 5 10 10 5 5 9.5 12
116.5 106% A  76  4 Another very talented retreader is going to find limitless possibilities for what's next combining design skills with technical
s7ratos 12.5 7 Good topic, valid page, image is huge needs next steps for Project #2, Project #1 is fine. 20 Fine job with a tough sample, misses paragraphs spec, plus bonus for SiteThumb
5 5 10
5 5 10 12 27 118.5 108% A  46  1 Sorry to see points lost, gotta study a bit more, already can do all the tech stuff, are attentive in class and otherwise outshine most others, the value's in the details so don't let them get by,.
dare 14.75 5 Validates fine, some overlapping links while attempting to do more than required, good start on Project #2 22 Close reading of the specs, met them all, plus SiteThumb 20 5 5 10 10 5 5 9 12
122.75 112% A  78  4 This stuff is all very, very easy for this fellow who did some tasks while I was talking about them, and I suspect the really tough stuff for others will be, too. Is already working ahead of some of our Juniors and Seniors, will be a welcome addition to our INFO program.
Scrappy 14.75 7 Valid page, Project #2 topic is fine, enthusiastic response for Project #1 goes beyond minimum requirements 22 Fine job with new medium, meets specs plus SiteThumb bonus 19 5
8 10 5
10 12
112.75 103% A

Don't let the tech sneak up on you again, learn to work from the 'outside in', get feedback from the machines where paper offers none I think you'll catch onto the tech 100%. Coupled with your work experience having you in INFO is going to add value for us all
MusicMan 14.25 1 Fine topic, but nothing much there, DTD must be exactly copied 17 OK quick job, validates, short on the paragraphs/semantic markup requirement, no constrained container 17.25 5
10 10 5
17 11
107.5 98% A

You've lived thru all this stuff, and I hope you'll get more INFO courses to wrap around your talented self, are bound to find some $$ about it.
bball 12.75 7 Valid page, good topic for Project #2, excellent adaptation of more complex sample is appreciated 19 Good adaptation of a complex sample, validates, no transparency demo'd, added SiteThumb 12 5 5 10 10 5 5 7.5 9
107.25 98% A

Thanks so much for your office visits and the opportunity to talk a bit. I look forward to seeing you in other classes, and am pleased you catch on to this stuff so easily. Don't sell yourself short, work at it for a couple of years and you'll have blasted past the competition. Having a BA for a mom is a good advantage.
72945 8.5 5 Fine topic, meets specs 22 Enthusiastic response the the specs has SiteThumb. Back pages lost the centered, constrained container. 14 5 5 10 10 5
9 11
104.5 95% A  62  3 Thank you so much for your attention to the details of this stuff, it's a pleasure posting an Ace for you.
28233 11.5 1 Only sample in place











12.5 11% Audit  76  4
65627 8.5 4.5 Doesn't validate but meets most specs, is using HUGE images please get them tamed for Project #2, topic is fine. 15 Threw together a good idea. Doesn't meet graphics requirement, no transparency, does Validate 13.25 5 5 10 10

10 11
92.25 84% B  60  2 There may be more points for you Best to you! I was delighted to see you pull off these excercises and hope to see you in other classes.
kys 10.5 3 Not valid, trying to use properties in tags, needs to use styles instead 19.5 No SiteThumb, short of some specs but has done some exploration with hover effects over images. Is hard to read some text over a very bold background.
5 5 10 10 5 5 8 10 12.5 103.5 86% B  60  2 Would be welcome in INFO, hope we keep you. Come to more classes, get more engaged, Ace what you do next.
38302 2.5 4 OK, later 13 Not much there, misses page requirement, no paragraphs, images are external & huge, resized on page, no transparency, no SiteThumb, doesn't validate 10.75 5 5 10 10 5 5 10 11
91.25 83% B

Glad to see you got it together for a good grade, wish it was higher. I'm hoping the gentle intro will help get you into the tough stuff of INFO and you'll excel.
1989415 5.5 4 Target' doesn't work in Strict XHTML, look to the sample pages for how to do this with JavaScript, otherwise is a good adaptation of the samples and good start on Project #2 17 No centered, constrained container on back pages. Hard to read text over bold background. No transparency apparent, no attempt to meet home page graphics requirement, blows way past 80Kbyte spec. 13 5 5 10 10 5
9.5 9
93 85% B  52  1 Caught on to most everything quickly, all presented in a foreign language, will be among our best advertisement when he gets out into the world.
lilbib 6.75 5 Fine job, validates, meets specs, good start on Project #2 22 Enthusiastic response to the, interesting topic well-treated. SiteThumb in place. 11.5 5 5 10 10

9 9
93.25 85% B  52  1 Attentive, talented, thanks for your good work.
xj 13.5 3 Good use of samples, doesn't validate, attempting to use properties in tags, need to be using styles. 16 Validates, but misses centered, constrained container. No SiteThumb. Blows way past graphics size requirement. Very hard to read text against busy background. 12.5 5 5 10 10

9.5 11
95.5 87% B  62  3 Another talented student new to the language, was a pleasure seeing him get his hands on technology and put it together.
Arenas 14.75 5 Fine adaptation of sample, fine topic, validates & meets specs 21 Excellent adaptation of sample stuff, fine reading of specs, plus SiteThumb bonus 16 5
10 10


10
91.75 83% B

Thanks so much for considering INFO, you'll be most welcome in the program and I hope it works out for you to do it.
soccer 12 5 Validates, shows investigation of borders, good start on Project #2 22 Exceeds specs and expectations, has SiteThumb, well-organized demo has it all. 14 5




9 10
77 70% C  54  2 Faithful attendance, quick grasp of some new tech, welcome in INFO if it's of interest to you!
Mango 9.5 4 Forbidden, nothing there 16 No SiteThumb, doesn't validate, is using properties in tags inappropriately, misses homepage graphics requirement 0

10


8 11 10.25 68.75 63% D  62  3 Sorry you got stuck in this situation. I hope to see some project work in my email when I get back to it.
28574 6.25 3 Uses in-line styles, no constrained, centered container 17 Misses home page graphics requirements, no constrained container, no SiteThumb. 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 11 5 57.25 52% F  - 

25740
4 Uses in-line styles, no constrained, centered container 16 No constrained container, misses semantic markup/paragraphs, misses transparency, no SiteThumb 0 5




2.5
0.5 28 25% F  48  2
47458
0 Forbidden, nothing there 5 Submitted very late, appears entirely ignorant of the specs for the project, has attended no classes so this isn't surprising.






1 9 7 22 20% F  - 
Never attended class, not once, except for quizzes which were flunked, then took an hour of my time wondering shy he flunked, doesn't seem to be able to add up the points his own self, claimed he was advised to take the class even though he couldn't attend it.
good luck 11 7 Fine job, validates, good topic for Project #2 14 Doesn't meet home page graphics requirement for transparency and blows way past the max size requirement, and also blows past the 2 megabyte limit for the whole site. There is no centered, constrained container, and a page that appears constructed to meet the 'semantic markup' requirement fails to do so, has no pararagraph tags and uses the h tags inappropriately. The project appears to be done by someone who ignored the specs, and it was submitted past the deadline. 9 5




5 10
61 55% F  42  1
87706
0 Forbidden

0








0 0% F


frankie 10.5 0 Forbidden, nothing there 0 Forbidden








10.5 10% F


61546
0 Forbidden, nothing there 0 Empty web directory








0 0% F  - 
Has been on the roster two semesters, but this pleasant young man has only attended one or two classes.
fire 14.25 1.5 Good start, still working, <img tags must have alt= for Strict xhtml 15 Only one page, no links, ignored 80K image requirement, no SiteThumb, does validate 0








30.75 28% F  42  1
crazy cat 4 3.5 Has 'broken' the centered, constrained container, otherwise valid 14 Doesn't validate, didn't fix obvious errors, doesn't meet graphics spec, blew past the byte size for graphics, no transparency demo'd, no semantic markup








21.5 20% F  - 

97752

Nothing there, student does not attend classes

0








0 0% F  - 

copper 12.5 5 Valid, easy on old eyes, good start for Project #2 16 Good idea for site, no SiteThumb, doesn't meet graphics spec for home page, no demo of transparency, no semantic markup.
5 5





43.5 40% F  - 

47523 4 1 Empty directory

0








5 5% F  78  4
Lee 6 7 Validates fine, novel topic for Project #2 15 Only one page, no transparency demo'd, doesn't meet graphics requirements, no constrained container, no SiteThumb, doesn't validate 10








38 35% F  64  3
techycd08 9.75 1.5 Invalid, attempted too-difficult sample, no mods to show topic for Project #2 0 Nothing done for Project 2








11.25 10% F


04539
0 Forbidden, nothing there 0 Forbidden








0 0% F


banana 6.5 3 Page not in requested location, topic OK 12 Incomplete site misses several specs, no SiteThumb.








21.5 20% F  - 

captain 3 3 Doesn't validate, good adaptation of the gallery sample. 18 OK adaptation of samples, no transparency demo'd misses paragraphs spec, no SiteThumb









24 22% F


83299 6.25 1 Empty directory








10

17.25 16% F  78  4
breaker 4 2 Doesn't validate, content is not readable against very busy background. 0 Nothing done for Project 2 10







16 15% F


61850
0 Forbidden











0 0% F  72  4
25407
3 Home page not named as spec'd, otherwise valid 0 Empty web directory








3 3% F  - 

baseball 4.5 1 Empty directory











5.5 5% F  66  3
64116
0 Forbidden, nothing there 0 Forbidden








0 0% F  - 

Dewey 1.5 3 Doesn't validate, need to check for matching tags, otherwise OK start for Project #2 12 No SiteThumb, doesn't meet home page graphics specs, no transparency demo'd, no back pages, no semantic markup, doesn't validate, didn't fix obvious errors.








16.5 15% F


money 6.75 3 Uses in-line styles, container can be wider that 800px 0 Forbidden








9.75 9% F


sajd 13.75 5 Fine job, validates, good topic for Project #2 19 Fine job, paragraphs and headers spread thru the pages, no SiteThumb 21.5 5 5 10 10 5
10 9
113.25 103%
3 What an honor having this talented gentleman in the class, was a pleasure seeing him get this stuff and put it to use in his environment.
67454
0 Forbidden











0 0%



VCUROCKS 6.25 7 Valid page, good topic for Project #2
Nothing there for Project 2 specs









13.25 12%
 -